GLOWBAL SKIN

What this means for you

Not registered yet, but its 09 Jul 2025 filing date beats anything filed after it. If it registers, the owner can stop confusingly similar uses in the classes it covers.

Record

Serial number

99275368

Mark type

Stylized text

Filed

09 Jul 2025

Attorney of record

Rosezena J. Pierce

Goods and services

• Class 003 — Cosmetics and cleaning preparations: Applicant has amended its identification of goods to the following: "Facial washes; Facial lotion; Facial oils; Facial cleansing preparations; Facial scrubs; Facial creams; Facial cleansing cream; Facial moisturizers." As amended, Applicant's goods are substantially narrower than those previously identified and are no longer closely related to Registrant's goods, namely, "Bath brushes." Applicant's goods consist exclusively of facial skincare products used to cleanse, moisturize, exfoliate, and maintain facial skin. These products are cosmetic preparations applied directly to the face and are purchased by consumers seeking facial skincare solutions. In contrast, Registrant's goods are bath brushes, which are handheld cleansing implements classified in a different international class and used as personal care accessories rather than skincare preparations. Importantly, Applicant's amended goods are facial-specific products that are not used in conjunction with bath brushes. Consumers ordinarily apply facial cleansers, facial lotions, facial moisturizers, facial oils, and facial creams using their hands or other facial skincare applicators specifically designed for use on facial skin. Bath brushes, by contrast, are generally intended for cleansing and exfoliating the body during bathing. As a result, the goods differ in purpose, function, method of use, and consumer expectations. The Examining Attorney's evidence focused largely on registrations and third party websites showing body lotions, soaps, body washes, and similar bath-related products offered together with bath brushes. However, Applicant has now deleted those goods and limited its application to facial skincare products only. Consequently, the evidence of record no longer reflects the goods identified in the application as amended. Accordingly, consumers are unlikely to believe that facial cleansers, facial moisturizers, facial creams, facial oils, and related facial skincare preparations originate from the same source as bath brushes merely because they are offered under similar marks. Given the substantial differences in the nature, purpose, and use of the parties' respective goods, this DuPont factor weighs against a finding of likelihood of confusion. Thus, because Applicant's amended facial skincare goods are distinct from Registrant's bath brushes, there is no likelihood of confusion as to source.

Owner

• Alexis Chapman, Chicago, IL, US

Prosecution history

• 09 Sept 2026 — TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
• 09 Sept 2026 — CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
• 09 Sept 2026 — TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
• 25 Jun 2026 — NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
• 25 Jun 2026 — FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
• 25 Jun 2026 — FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
• 05 Jun 2026 — TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
• 03 Jun 2026 — CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
• 03 Jun 2026 — TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
• 02 Mar 2026 — APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
• 02 Mar 2026 — APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
• 04 Dec 2025 — NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
• 04 Dec 2025 — NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
• 04 Dec 2025 — NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
• 28 Nov 2025 — ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER