COMMERCEPOINTE
Dead / Cancelled — Cancelled — Section 8 (as of 27 Dec 2019)
What this means for you
This registration has been cancelled; it no longer blocks anyone on its own. The name may be available, but check before relying on it — rights can also come from actual use, not only from the register.
Record
- Serial number
- 77392725
- Registration number
- 3628121
- Mark type
- Stylized text
- Filed
- 08 Feb 2008
- Published for opposition
- 24 Jun 2008
- Registered
- 26 May 2009
- Attorney of record
- David M. Kelly
Goods and services
- Class 036 — Insurance and financial services: payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services
- Class 042 — Scientific and technological services: providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in payment processing for use by retail merchants to facilitate merchants' acceptance of credit card, debit card and electronic check payments online in connection with the purchase of consumer goods and services
Owner
- FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, JACKSONVILLE, FL, US
- Certegy Check Services, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, US
- Certegy Check Services, Inc., St. Petersburg, FL, US
- Certegy Check Services, Inc., St. Petersburg, FL, US
Prosecution history
- 27 Dec 2019 — CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
- 22 Aug 2018 — AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
- 26 May 2018 — COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
- 29 May 2015 — NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
- 29 May 2015 — REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
- 29 May 2015 — CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
- 14 May 2015 — TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
- 23 Feb 2015 — TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
- 02 Jul 2013 — TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
- 26 May 2009 — REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
- 17 Apr 2009 — LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
- 17 Apr 2009 — ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
- 16 Apr 2009 — STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
- 30 Mar 2009 — USE AMENDMENT FILED
- 16 Apr 2009 — CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL